The Responsible Mining Index (RMI) supports the principle that minerals and metals mining should benefit the economies, improve the lives of people and respect the environments of producing countries, while also benefiting mining companies in a fair and viable way.

With this in mind, the goal of RMI is to encourage continuous improvement in responsible mining across the industry by transparently assessing the policies and practices of large, geographically dispersed mining companies on a range of economic, environmental, social and governance (EESG) issues, with the emphasis on leading practice and learning.

RMI assesses companies from the perspective of what society can reasonably expect of large-scale mining companies, and examines the extent to which companies are addressing a range of EESG issues in a systematic manner across all their mining activities and throughout the project lifecycle.

This first Index, RMI 2018, covers 30 companies from 16 home countries, including publicly-listed, state-owned and private companies. These companies operate more than 850 sites in over 40 producing countries, and the assessment covers most mined commodities, excluding oil and gas. The Index focuses largely on company-wide behaviour, while also looking at site-level actions at 127 mine sites, in order to provide a snapshot of information disaggregated to the level of individual mining operations.

The RMI assessment is based on publicly available information on these companies and mine sites. As an evidence-based assessment, the Index measures the extent to which companies can demonstrate, rather than simply claim, that they have established responsible policies and practices.

Findings in context
Over recent decades, many large-scale mining companies have shown significant improvements in how they manage EESG issues, as evidenced by the introduction of innovative practices and the engagement with partners and multi-stakeholder initiatives on responsible mining. Yet the RMI results indicate that it is still hard to find evidence of systematic, effective action at any one company on the range of topics that society can reasonably expect companies to address.

Although the individual company results indicate that much more can be achieved, the positive message is that it can be done. The RMI 2018 results show that if one company were to attain all the highest scores achieved for every indicator, it would reach over 70% of the maximum achievable score. This implies that existing best practice, if systematically applied by all companies, could already go some way to meeting society expectations.

Many companies have demonstrated that they are establishing responsible policies and practices on particular issues. The fact that 19 of the 30 assessed companies show up at least once among the stronger performers in RMI’s different thematic areas, also indicates that performance does not necessarily depend on company size, commodity focus, or geographic location.

RMI commends the thoughtful and innovative approaches to leading practice, and the efforts of many companies to address the range of economic, environmental, social and governance issues covered in this report.

The intention is that this report will provide learning and inspiration for more companies to follow responsible practice, and encourage the companies in the 2018 Responsible Mining Index to maintain their efforts on continuous improvement.

Responsible Mining Foundation
The Foundation supports the principle that mining should benefit the economies, improve the lives of peoples, and respect the environments of producing countries, particularly in some of the world’s poorest regions, while ensuring that mining companies benefit in a fair and viable way.

2018 Responsible Mining Index - Summary Report - Responsible Mining Foundation, 2018 DOWNLOAD
2018 Responsible Mining Index - Summary Report (Bahasa Indonesia) - Responsible Mining Foundation, 2018 DOWNLOAD
Rapport de synthèse du RMI 2018 (Français) - Responsible Mining Foundation, 2018 DOWNLOAD
RMI Methodology Report 2017 (English) - RMF, 2017 DOWNLOAD
Unduh Laporan Metodologi 2017 - RMF, 2017 DOWNLOAD
Téléchargez le Rapport de méthodologie 2017 - RMF, 2017 DOWNLOAD

post

page

attachment

revision

nav_menu_item

custom_css

customize_changeset

oembed_cache

user_request

wp_block

wp_template

wp_template_part

wp_global_styles

wp_navigation

wp_font_family

wp_font_face

acf-taxonomy

acf-post-type

acf-field-group

acf-field

ai1ec_event

exactmetrics_note

Reality Behind Brands’ CSR Hypocrisy: An Investigative Report on China Suppliers of ZARA, H&M, and GAP
Publications

In the spring of 2015 and 2016, SACOM conducted undercover investigations inside four of Zara, H&M, and GAP’s supplier factories in China. Despite three brands’ CSR policies appear to be comprehensive and enable them to proclaim ethical, SA...Read More

Ethical Audits and the Supply Chains of Global Corporations
Publications

Many key questions and serious concerns hang over the ethical audit regime. These include: are audits effective in identifying non-compliance and driving up standards, what does the audit regime mean for governments and NGOs, where does power lie wi...Read More

Forced to beg Child trafficking from Guinea-Bissau to Senegal
GuidancePublications

Taking children from Guinea-Bissau to Senegal and forcing them to beg on the streets has become the most visible form of human trafficking in both countries. Many Quranic teachers and intermediaries’ prey on vulnerable families in Guinea-Bissau. O...Read More

TAGS: Africa
Special Issue – Migration, Sexuality, and Gender Identity
Publications

This special issue of Anti-Trafficking Review bridges the fields of queer and transgender studies, migration studies, research on sex work, and critiques of the discourse on human trafficking. Along with centring LGBTQI+ subjects as actors within th...Read More

TAGS: Global