Every year, more than 100,000 people are detained for migration control purposes in the European Union.

Immigration detention places individuals’ lives on hold, as people do not know when, or if, they will ever be released. It has a severe impact on mental health, with studies indicating higher incidence of anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder than among the rest of the population, and an average of very high levels of depression in four out of every five detainees. Moreover, detention is often characterised by insufficient or inadequate access to information and interpreters, violation of procedural safeguards, lack of access to medical care, and isolation, which further place individuals in a situation of vulnerability. Therefore, detention is always a harmful practice, whose negative impact broadly exceeds its purposed objectives.

The harmful impact of immigration detention is further exacerbated when it adds to pre-existing factors that already put detainees in a situation of vulnerability, including poor physical or mental health conditions, disabilities, part experiences of trauma, or age.

This report analyses states’ legal obligations in relation to immigration detention and vulnerability, and draws concrete recommendations on how to ensure that migration policies refrain from creating or exacerbating situations of vulnerability. It is based on the analysis of the international and European legal framework and a comparative analysis of the law and practice in five European countries: Belgium, Greece, the Netherlands, Spain and the United Kingdom

Preventing and Addressing Vulnerabilities in Immigration Enforcement Policies - PICUM, 2021 DOWNLOAD

post

page

attachment

revision

nav_menu_item

custom_css

customize_changeset

oembed_cache

user_request

wp_block

wp_template

wp_template_part

wp_global_styles

wp_navigation

wp_font_family

wp_font_face

acf-taxonomy

acf-post-type

acf-field-group

acf-field

ai1ec_event

exactmetrics_note

Modern Slavery Act Transparency in Supply Chains
COVID-19 resourcesStandards & Codes of Conduct

CGI IT UK Limited is among the largest independent IT and business consulting services organisations in the world. This statement is published pursuant to section 54(1) of the Modern Slavery Act 2015 and constitutes CGI UK’s fifth Modern Slavery a...Read More

IFC Performance Standard 2
Standards & Codes of Conduct

For any business, its workforce is its most valuable asset. A sound worker-management relationship is key to the success of any enterprise. PS2 asks that companies treat their workers fairly, provide safe and healthy working conditions, avoid the u...Read More

Sustainability Report 2019- Responsible Sourcing
Good Practices

Wilmar International Limited (‘Wilmar’ or ‘the Group’) has prepared this report in accordance with the Global Reporting Initiative Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards): Core option. This report examines sustainability; our...Read More

Inditex Group Modern Slavery, Human Trafficking and Transparency in Supply Chain Statement FY2019
Standards & Codes of Conduct

This Statement, made pursuant to Section 54 of the UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 (taking into account the Guidance issued by the UK Government on 20 April 2020 on modern slavery reporting during the COVID-19 pandemic), Section 14 of the Australia Moder...Read More