On October 28th, 2019, the OECD launched new guidance on Due Diligence for Responsible Corporate Lending and Securities Underwriting (hereinafter “the guidance”). The guidance is based and elaborates on the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, providing authoritative clarifications of banks’ responsibilities to prevent adverse impacts on human rights and the environment.

This is the OECD’s second guidance paper on responsible business conduct in the financial sector, following the 2017 guidance on Responsible Business Conduct for Institutional Investors.

This new guidance represents important progress and a step forward in the international normative framework that serves to encourage responsible conduct by banks and other financial sector actors and that also serves to hold financial actors accountable for adverse social and environmental impacts associated with their activities. It provides authoritative clarifications of government-backed expectations of banks, making particularly important clarifications on issues related to when a bank has “contributed” to an adverse impact through its lending or underwriting and what role a bank can and should play in remediating adverse impacts associated with its activities.

The 48 governments adhering to the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises have made a commitment to promote this guidance with banks and monitor its implementation, and banks operating or headquartered in these 48 countries are expected to follow the guidance. Civil society, including trade unions, non-governmental organisations (NGOs), and individuals, who feel that a bank has not abided by the recommended responsible behaviour can file a complaint against the bank at the National Contact Point (NCP) in the country in which the bank is headquartered and request that the NCP refer to the guidance in providing recommendations to the bank.

Some key areas in which the new paper provides important clarifications and guidance related to the due diligence and responsible conduct expected of banks include:

  1. Relationship of banks to adverse impacts and remedy
  2. Bank-level grievance mechanisms
  3. Transparency and client confidentiality
  4. Sustainability responsibilities
  5. Public policy advocacy
  6. Engagement with rights holders
  7. Disengagement and divestment
  8. Engagement with rights holders Disengagement and divestment.
The OECD Due Diligence for Responsible Corporate Lending and Securities Underwriting - OECD, 2019 DOWNLOAD

post

page

attachment

revision

nav_menu_item

custom_css

customize_changeset

oembed_cache

user_request

wp_block

wp_template

wp_template_part

wp_global_styles

wp_navigation

wp_font_family

wp_font_face

acf-taxonomy

acf-post-type

acf-field-group

acf-field

ai1ec_event

exactmetrics_note

Forced to beg Child trafficking from Guinea-Bissau to Senegal
GuidancePublications

Taking children from Guinea-Bissau to Senegal and forcing them to beg on the streets has become the most visible form of human trafficking in both countries. Many Quranic teachers and intermediaries’ prey on vulnerable families in Guinea-Bissau. O...Read More

TAGS: Africa
Risks and Considerations for Businesses and Individuals with Exposure to Entities Engaged in Forced Labor and other Human Rights Abuses linked to Xinjiang, China
GuidancePublications

The People’s Republic of China (PRC) government continues to carry out genocide and crimes against humanity against Uyghurs and members of other ethnic and religious minority groups in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (Xinjiang), China The PR...Read More

TAGS: Asia
World Report 2023
Publications

Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international or...Read More

TAGS:
The Voice of British Survivors of Modern Slavery
Publications

British survivors of modern day slavery are not being adequately listened to or heard in the antislavery sector, let alone across the UK. Yet they are the now the largest cohort in the Government’s annual modern slavery referral data. This evasion...Read More