This report was researched and written by Chloe Setter, Emiel Coltof, Aisling Ledwith, Nyonsuabeleah Kollue, and Abigail Munroe.

Cracks in the System is a new report from Lumos that is the first of its kind to systematically explore the links between institutional care and child trafficking in Europe.

For many years, it has been known that traffickers directly target children in the care systems of many countries for recruitment into trafficking and that care leavers are at increased risk of exploitation. Despite this, laws and policies across Europe seldom connect the issues of child institutionalisation and child trafficking.

This new research identifies four main ways in which trafficking is linked with institutions for children, referred to as “institution-related trafficking”:

  • Children are recruited and trafficked into institutions, solely for the purpose of financial profit (“orphanage trafficking”), and other forms of exploitation;
  • Children are trafficked from orphanages/institutions into other forms of exploitation;
  • Child trafficking victims and unaccompanied children are often placed in institutions for “protection”, which can put them at risk of trafficking and re-trafficking;
  • Care-leavers are more vulnerable to exploitation and trafficking.

Cracks in the System aims to synthesise, appraise and build on the current evidence base on the phenomenon of institution-related trafficking and its manifestations in diverse contexts around Europe.

Importantly, it also provides recommendations on how to address the specific vulnerability to exploitation of children in or at risk of institutional care in Europe.

Cracks in the System - Lumos, 2020 DOWNLOAD

post

page

attachment

revision

nav_menu_item

custom_css

customize_changeset

oembed_cache

user_request

wp_block

wp_template

wp_template_part

wp_global_styles

wp_navigation

wp_font_family

wp_font_face

acf-taxonomy

acf-post-type

acf-field-group

acf-field

ai1ec_event

exactmetrics_note

From Policies to Impacts: Analysing Modern Slavery Risks in Portfolio Companies
Guidance

As a result of the progressive legalization of international business and human rights “soft law” standards, the “S” of “ESG” is no longer an optional criterion for investors to include in their decision-making process, but it is becom...Read More

Paper Promises? Evaluating the Early Impact of Australia’s Modern Slavery Act
Guidance

The Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Cth) (MSA) was widely hailed as a critical first step by Australia towards tackling the global problem of modern slavery, with the government proclaiming that it would transform the way businesses respond ...Read More

Evidence from Japanese companies assessment on human rights due diligence
Guidance

The Human Rights Council unanimously endorsed the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) in 2011. More than 10 years later, this global standard for how business should respect human rights has driven some positive change. While ...Read More

Responsible Recruitment – Addressing Gaps in Protections for Migrant Workers
Guidance

This report is the second of two reports developed by IHRB in cooperation with Equidem Research & Consulting. Building on "Responsible Recruitment: Remediating Worker-Paid Recruitment Fees", this publication offers practical guidance to businesse...Read More