Foreign migrant workers are often faced with a choice: pay illegal or unethical recruitment fees for a job abroad or go without work altogether. To finance these exorbitant costs, which can be as high as USD 6,000 in some migration corridors, they often take out loans. The resulting debts, borne by workers over the course of their employment term, significantly increase workers’ vulnerability to debt bondage and are a root cause of forced labor globally. In Verité’s experience, the charging of recruitment fees and expenses to migrant workers is the most significant contributor to the persistence of debt bondage, the manifestation of forced labor, or “modern slavery” most frequently encountered in global supply chains today.

In recent years, a growing number of multinational corporations (MNCs) and their suppliers have begun to adopt “Employer Pays” and “No-Fees to Workers” recruitment policies and practices. When enforced, these policies help to ensure that employers in supply chains absorb the true cost of recruitment and prohibit the charging of recruitment costs to workers, in accordance with international standards and regulations. If workers are charged recruitment costs, ideally, remediation would be initiated to provide for the prompt reimbursement of the full amount to workers. But that is only when the policy is enforced, and employers and recruitment agents are held accountable.

Financial and Contractual Approaches to Mitigating Foreign Migrant Worker Recruitment-Related Risks - Verité, October 2019 DOWNLOAD

post

page

attachment

revision

nav_menu_item

custom_css

customize_changeset

oembed_cache

user_request

wp_block

wp_template

wp_template_part

wp_global_styles

wp_navigation

wp_font_family

wp_font_face

acf-field-group

acf-field

ai1ec_event

A stitch in time saved none: How fashion brands fueled violence in the factory and beyond
Guidance

This study documents women garment workers’ experiences of gender- based violence and harassment (GBVH) in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic in Asian production countries. It elaborates “economic harm” as a form of GBVH, underscoring how the b...Read More

Adidas Guidelines on Employment Standards
Guidance

To explain how it expects its suppliers to live up to its Standards, Adidas has produced a number of supporting guidelines that detail its expectations for fair, healthy, safe workplace conditions and environmentally sound factory operations. T...Read More

Discussion Sheet on Factory Health and Safety
COVID-19 resourcesGuidance

Keeping workers safe needs to be top priority amongst both clothing brands, their suppliers and the worker representatives. To give targeted guidance on how to keep workers safe, we have developed this discussion sheet which, in combination with our...Read More

Decision No. 557 OSCE Action Plan to Combat Trafficking in Human Beings
Guidance

The OSCE Action Plan to Combat Trafficking in Human Beings is a strategic, long-term toolkit. It comprises advanced and comprehensive recommendations in the areas of prosecution, prevention, protection, co-ordination, and partnerships. Taking into ac...Read More