The Australian Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Cth) (the Act) requires that a review be undertaken three years after the commencement of the Act. The review is to be completed within one year and the report is to be tabled in the Parliament. (The British law underwent review in 2019 at the initiative of the UK Government.)

This review was announced on 31 March 2022 by the former Australian Minister administering the Act, the Hon Jason Wood MP, Assistant Minister for Customs, Community Safety and Multicultural Affairs. Professor John McMillan AO was engaged to lead the review, with the support of the Modern Slavery and Human Trafficking Branch (MSHTB) – then in the Australian Border Force (ABF), and now in the AttorneyGeneral’s Department (AGD) in accordance with the Administrative Arrangements Order issued 23 June 2022. Professor McMillan is an Emeritus Professor at the Australian National University, and has relevant professional experience in public law as a legal practitioner and Commonwealth and State agency head. He has held appointments as Commonwealth and NSW Ombudsman, Australian Information Commissioner and Integrity Commissioner with the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity.

Terms of Reference for the review are ar Appendix A to this paper. The stated objective of the review is to consider the operation of the Act over the first three years and to look at options for improved operation and compliance. The review will consider both the terms of the Act and its administrative implementation. Specific features of the Act that are mentioned in the Terms of Reference are the reporting entity threshold, reporting periods and deadlines, mandatory reporting criteria, enforcement mechanisms, and the option of establishing an independent Anti-Slavery Commissioner (or similar body) to oversee implementation and enforcement of the Act. These issues are considered in this paper and raised in consultation questions that are set out in full in Section 6 of this paper, ‘Have Your Say’.

The review is to be conducted in an open, transparent and consultative manner. This Issues Paper initiates that process by inviting written submissions on the issues to be considered as the primary form of input. This will be supplemented by targeted consultations, in and outside government, and a survey of entities reporting under the Act.

The review team will consult widely and, to the extent practicable, respond to any consultation invitation from organisations (particularly representative bodies) that have a keen practical interest in the operation of the Act.

Review of Australia’s Modern Slavery Act 2018: Issues Paper - Australian Government, 2022 DOWNLOAD

post

page

attachment

revision

nav_menu_item

custom_css

customize_changeset

oembed_cache

user_request

wp_block

wp_template

wp_template_part

wp_global_styles

wp_navigation

wp_font_family

wp_font_face

acf-taxonomy

acf-post-type

acf-field-group

acf-field

ai1ec_event

exactmetrics_note

Children’s Rights in the Garment and Footwear Supply Chain
Guidance

This guidance tool is designed to support companies in the garment and footwear sector to integrate child rights into their responsible sourcing programmes. It explores practical steps companies can take – individually and collectively – to ensu...Read More

Updated Guide to Ethics and Human Rights in Anti-Trafficking: Ethical Standards for Working with Migrant Workers and Trafficked Persons in the Digital Age
Guidance

Prepared by Lisa Rende Taylor and Mark Latonero. As digital technologies such as mobile phones and social media are permeating the lives of people across the globe, more organizations working in anti-trafficking and responsible sourcing are seek...Read More

Evidence from Japanese companies assessment on human rights due diligence
Guidance

The Human Rights Council unanimously endorsed the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) in 2011. More than 10 years later, this global standard for how business should respect human rights has driven some positive change. While ...Read More

Using Worker Voice Tools to Assess Relationships Between Workers and their Managers
Guidance

This note focuses on one dimension of how technology-enabled worker voice tools can be used: to gather qualitative data about the nature of relationships between managers and workers or communities at factories, farms, mines, and plantations. This i...Read More