The Australian Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Cth) (the Act) requires that a review be undertaken three years after the commencement of the Act. The review is to be completed within one year and the report is to be tabled in the Parliament. (The British law underwent review in 2019 at the initiative of the UK Government.)

This review was announced on 31 March 2022 by the former Australian Minister administering the Act, the Hon Jason Wood MP, Assistant Minister for Customs, Community Safety and Multicultural Affairs. Professor John McMillan AO was engaged to lead the review, with the support of the Modern Slavery and Human Trafficking Branch (MSHTB) – then in the Australian Border Force (ABF), and now in the AttorneyGeneral’s Department (AGD) in accordance with the Administrative Arrangements Order issued 23 June 2022. Professor McMillan is an Emeritus Professor at the Australian National University, and has relevant professional experience in public law as a legal practitioner and Commonwealth and State agency head. He has held appointments as Commonwealth and NSW Ombudsman, Australian Information Commissioner and Integrity Commissioner with the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity.

Terms of Reference for the review are ar Appendix A to this paper. The stated objective of the review is to consider the operation of the Act over the first three years and to look at options for improved operation and compliance. The review will consider both the terms of the Act and its administrative implementation. Specific features of the Act that are mentioned in the Terms of Reference are the reporting entity threshold, reporting periods and deadlines, mandatory reporting criteria, enforcement mechanisms, and the option of establishing an independent Anti-Slavery Commissioner (or similar body) to oversee implementation and enforcement of the Act. These issues are considered in this paper and raised in consultation questions that are set out in full in Section 6 of this paper, ‘Have Your Say’.

The review is to be conducted in an open, transparent and consultative manner. This Issues Paper initiates that process by inviting written submissions on the issues to be considered as the primary form of input. This will be supplemented by targeted consultations, in and outside government, and a survey of entities reporting under the Act.

The review team will consult widely and, to the extent practicable, respond to any consultation invitation from organisations (particularly representative bodies) that have a keen practical interest in the operation of the Act.

Review of Australia’s Modern Slavery Act 2018: Issues Paper - Australian Government, 2022 DOWNLOAD

post

page

attachment

revision

nav_menu_item

custom_css

customize_changeset

oembed_cache

user_request

wp_block

wp_template

wp_template_part

wp_global_styles

wp_navigation

wp_font_family

wp_font_face

acf-taxonomy

acf-post-type

acf-field-group

acf-field

ai1ec_event

exactmetrics_note

Modern Slavery: Deceptive and Coercive Recruitment
GuidanceGood PracticesGraphics & Infographics

Workers are recruited via unlicensed third-party agencies. Use of unlicensed third-party agencies increases the risk of labor exploitation. Workers pay for recruitment, employment or repatriation fees. Costs associated with employment can place ...Read More

TAGS: Global
Protecting Migrant Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic
COVID-19 resourcesGuidance

This policy brief provides information and identifies a number of key recommendations to assist governments and other stakeholders in designing COVID-19 policy responses that can help to ensure the protection of migrant workers, as well as to inform...Read More

Free and Fair Labor in Palm Oil Production: Principles and Implementation Guidance
Guidance

The Free and Fair Labor Principles (“Principles”) and corresponding Implementation Guidance (“Guidance”) is intended to support and advance the ongoing dialogue on responsible palm oil by providing a common point of reference on what consti...Read More

Forced Labor: Actions Needed to Prevent the Availability of At-Risk Goods in DOD’s Commissaries and Exchanges
Guidance

The Department of Defense (DOD) has some policies and processes in place to prevent the resale of goods produced through forced labor in its commissaries and exchanges. However, despite their generally common business of providing reduced- priced gr...Read More