On October 28th, 2019, the OECD launched new guidance on Due Diligence for Responsible Corporate Lending and Securities Underwriting (hereinafter “the guidance”). The guidance is based and elaborates on the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, providing authoritative clarifications of banks’ responsibilities to prevent adverse impacts on human rights and the environment.

This is the OECD’s second guidance paper on responsible business conduct in the financial sector, following the 2017 guidance on Responsible Business Conduct for Institutional Investors.

This new guidance represents important progress and a step forward in the international normative framework that serves to encourage responsible conduct by banks and other financial sector actors and that also serves to hold financial actors accountable for adverse social and environmental impacts associated with their activities. It provides authoritative clarifications of government-backed expectations of banks, making particularly important clarifications on issues related to when a bank has “contributed” to an adverse impact through its lending or underwriting and what role a bank can and should play in remediating adverse impacts associated with its activities.

The 48 governments adhering to the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises have made a commitment to promote this guidance with banks and monitor its implementation, and banks operating or headquartered in these 48 countries are expected to follow the guidance. Civil society, including trade unions, non-governmental organisations (NGOs), and individuals, who feel that a bank has not abided by the recommended responsible behaviour can file a complaint against the bank at the National Contact Point (NCP) in the country in which the bank is headquartered and request that the NCP refer to the guidance in providing recommendations to the bank.

Some key areas in which the new paper provides important clarifications and guidance related to the due diligence and responsible conduct expected of banks include:

  1. Relationship of banks to adverse impacts and remedy
  2. Bank-level grievance mechanisms
  3. Transparency and client confidentiality
  4. Sustainability responsibilities
  5. Public policy advocacy
  6. Engagement with rights holders
  7. Disengagement and divestment
  8. Engagement with rights holders Disengagement and divestment.
The OECD Due Diligence for Responsible Corporate Lending and Securities Underwriting - OECD, 2019 DOWNLOAD

post

page

attachment

revision

nav_menu_item

custom_css

customize_changeset

oembed_cache

user_request

wp_block

wp_template

wp_template_part

wp_global_styles

wp_navigation

wp_font_family

wp_font_face

acf-taxonomy

acf-post-type

acf-field-group

acf-field

ai1ec_event

exactmetrics_note

A Wall of Silence: The Construction Sector’s Response to Migrant Rights in Qatar and the UAE
Publications

Business & Human Rights Resource Centre has quizzed 100 construction companies operating in Qatar and the UAE on the measures they are taking to stop exploitation of migrant workers. Only 22 responded, indicating a shocking level of inaction. ...Read More

The Role of Recruitment Fees and Abusive and Fraudulent Recruitment Practices of Recruitment Agencies in Trafficking in Persons
Publications

The purpose of the paper is to examine the relationship between recruitment fees and other abusive and fraudulent practices of recruitment agencies and trafficking in persons, with a particular focus on criminal justice measures to address this relat...Read More

Knowledge of and access to frontline workers among poor, rural households in Amhara region, Ethiopia: a mixed-methods study
Publications

Social protection programmes have effectively reduced poverty and improved food security. However, the effects of poverty require an intersectoral approach to adequately address poor nutrition and health. Identifying gaps in knowledge and access to ...Read More

TAGS:
National Hotline 2018 Louisiana State Report
Graphics & InfographicsPublications

The data in this report represents signals and cases from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 and is accurate as of July 25, 2019. Cases of trafficking may be ongoing or new information may revealed to the National Hotline over time. Consequen...Read More