The Covid-19 pandemic has once again exposed the fragility of global supply chains and the enormous risks to human and labour rights in a highly interconnected global economy that is not governed by the rule of law.

With the global drop in demand as a result of the pandemic, many companies have resorted to abruptly ending the procurement of goods and services and even to defaulting on prior commitments made – with the consequence of a disastrous impact for workers in global supply chains. In Bangladesh, more than half of the garment suppliers reported that they had their in-process or completed production cancelled, which has led to massive job losses and workers getting furloughed. More than 98.1% of buyers refused to contribute to the cost of paying the partial wages to furloughed workers required under national law. 72.4% of furloughed workers were sent home without pay.

As the economic consequences of the pandemic have spread, years of voluntary corporate social responsibility promises by companies have vanished overnight. In the absence of an appropriate regulatory framework, global companies have been able to evade responsibilities for the workers who produced the goods and provided the services that allowed them to generate enormous profits.

Today, 94% of workers producing goods and providing services to global companies are hidden workers and not directly hired by their economic employer. Instead, the majority of these workers are exposed to precarious working conditions without access to remedy due to an obscure web of a global network of operations and businesses designed to protect companies from accountability.

To ensure that the global economy is not only resilient but also conducive to social progress, governments must now take decisive legislative steps to regulate the behaviour of companies with regard to their entire operations and activities. The introduction of mandatory due diligence in domestic legislation would for the first time give workers a legal framework for redress wherever their employer resides and prevent companies from evading their responsibilities towards not only their workers but also society and the planet. Within multinational groups of companies, the “parent company” would be required to deploy its best efforts to ensure that the subsidiaries comply with certain requirements; and within global supply chains, the “lead company” would be required to ensure that by imposing its conditions on the sub-contracted seller or service-provider, human rights are fully complied with across the whole chain.

Towards mandatory due diligence in global supply chains- International Trade Union Confederation, 2020 DOWNLOAD

post

page

attachment

revision

nav_menu_item

custom_css

customize_changeset

oembed_cache

user_request

wp_block

wp_template

wp_template_part

wp_global_styles

wp_navigation

wp_font_family

wp_font_face

acf-taxonomy

acf-post-type

acf-field-group

acf-field

ai1ec_event

exactmetrics_note

Model Contract Clauses to Protect Workers In International Supply Chains
GuidanceStandards & Codes of Conduct

The American Bar Association (ABA) Business Law Section Working Group undertook an extensive project to help buyers and suppliers redesign their contracts to better protect human rights in supply chains, with a focus on a cooperative approach with s...Read More

TAGS:
Fashioning a beautiful future? Supporting workers and addressing labour exploitation in Leicester’s textile and garment industry
Guidance

This report presents the results of a four-month research study into systemic and locality based factors underpinning labour exploitation within Leicester’s Garment and Textile industry, with particular emphasis on the perspective of frontline wor...Read More

How to prevent modern slavery: A report by Unseen based on data from the modern slavery & exploitation helpline and lived experience accounts
Guidance

In 2021, the number of people referred to the UK Government’s system of identification and support, the National Referral Mechanism (NRM), stood at 12,727. Of those, only 2,866 were given a Positive Conclusive Grounds decision, conf...Read More

Business and human rights: A five-step guide for company boards
Guidance

The guide is for boards of companies in the United Kingdom. It sets out five steps boards should follow to satisfy themselves that their companies identify, mitigate and report on the human rights impacts of their activities. These steps will also he...Read More