No country in the world is immune to the devastating impacts of modern slavery and human trafficking. Representing one of the world’s most profitable criminal enterprises, it generates some USD 150 billion per year. Addressing the financial angle of these gross human rights abuses is recognized as an essential approach in tackling the problem. The engagement of the financial sector, alongside the use of several financial-related policy instruments, play a vital role. This includes measures to counter money laundering and the financing of terrorism.

To date, the UN has only used targeted sanctions in a limited number of cases in relation to modern slavery and human trafficking. Going a step further, a number of other actors, including the US, EU, UK, Canada, and Australia, have employed their own autonomous (or unilateral) sanctions to tackle the global challenge, or have started to develop legal frameworks to allow for their eventual employment. These are measures that either supplement multilateral – UN – sanctions, or are imposed entirely separately.

However, the use of these types of sanctions to tackle modern slavery and human trafficking is not yet widespread or particularly hard-hitting. When used, they are largely limited to asset freezes and travel bans. Some do not reference modern slavery and human trafficking outright, but instead address the problem under broader umbrella terms such as human rights or conflict resolution. Furthermore, such measures do not yet involve some of the more sophisticated financial sanctions that have been developed elsewhere in recent years. Clear policy communication is also lacking on the overarching strategies underlying the current use of some sanctions to tackle modern slavery and human trafficking. It is also not yet clear whether these sanctions are intended to seriously disrupt trafficking networks, rather than occupying less ambitious, more symbolic functions such as “naming and shaming.” There are also major gaps regarding enforcement, political will, capacity, and engagement across sectors.

This report, commissioned by the Finance Against Slavery and Trafficking (FAST) initiative at United Nations University Centre for Policy Research (UNU-CPR), is based on 18 anonymized semi-structured interviews with officials from the UN, US, EU, UK, and Canada, financial institution representatives and experts on sanctions, modern slavery and human trafficking, transnational organized crime, supply chains, and corporate governance. These interviews were conducted between 15 December 2021 and 4 March 2022. This study is also based on desk research, including on existing sanctions regimes, relevant legislation and academic/policy studies. Finally, it benefited from consultations with 12 academic, think tank and financial sector experts.

What is the Role of Financial Sanctions in Tackling Modern Slavery and Human Trafficking? - The Liechtenstein Initiative for Finance Against Slavery and Trafficking, 2022 DOWNLOAD

post

page

attachment

revision

nav_menu_item

custom_css

customize_changeset

oembed_cache

user_request

wp_block

wp_template

wp_template_part

wp_global_styles

wp_navigation

wp_font_family

wp_font_face

acf-taxonomy

acf-post-type

acf-field-group

acf-field

ai1ec_event

exactmetrics_note

Training manual to fight trafficking in children for labour, sexual and other forms of exploitation
Publications

This training manual – developed by ILO and UNICEF under the UN Global Initiative to Fight Human Trafficking – seeks to aid governments, workers, employers, international, and non-governmental organizations that combat trafficking in children f...Read More

TAGS: Global
Human rights impacts of Nordic investments in renewable energy developments in the Global South
Publications

The climate emergency poses a huge threat to human rights. In order to address the climate crisis, a transition to an economy respectful of the planet is urgently required. As part of this green transition, moving away from fossil energy sources, to...Read More

TRADING AT ANY COST: DUTCH GOVERNMENT PUTS ECONOMIC INTERESTS BEFORE PROTECTING HUMAN RIGHTS
Publications

For over a decade, the Netherlands has put its trading interests above its duty to protect against human rights abuse by companies operating under its jurisdiction. This report, based on Amnesty International research conducted between March and ...Read More

TAGS:
We Name it so we Can Repair it
Publications

In recent years, research and dialogue about best practices for incorporating survivor input into anti-trafficking programming and policies have come to the forefront of work to end human trafficking. Historically, the infrastructure of addressing a...Read More

TAGS: