Introduction
On May 1-2, 2014, Shift held the fifth in its series of workshops with companies participating in its Business Learning Program, co-hosted with the Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government. The workshop focused on the concept of remedy in the context of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, which plays a key role in meeting the expectations of the corporate responsibility to respect human rights.

The fundamental expectations of businesses in respecting human rights are set forth in Guiding Principle 11: “Businesses should avoid infringing on the rights of others and should address adverse human rights impacts with which they are involved.” In essence, the Guiding Principles recognize that, even with the best policies and processes to prevent potential human rights impacts from occurring, impacts can still occur – whether because the impact was unexpected or because the business was unable to prevent it.

The Guiding Principles therefore articulate two distinctive types of responsibilities for businesses in respecting human rights:
• A forward-looking responsibility of businesses to prevent human rights impacts from occurring (which are captured in processes for human rights due diligence, prevention and mitigation); and,
• A backward-looking responsibility of businesses to address human rights impacts when they do occur (which are captured by the concepts of remediation and leverage).

The concept of remediation becomes critical in understanding this backward-looking responsibility to address human rights impacts when they occur.

Drawing on both the experience of participating companies and challenges they have faced in practice, together with Shift’s experience working on issues related to remediation, the workshop sought to generate both practical and creative ideas for companies on how to approach their responsibilities in relation to remediation of human rights impacts. The workshop operated under the Chatham House rule, and accordingly this report aggregates some key ideas that contributed to or resulted from the discussions.

Remediation, Grievance Mechanisms and the Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights - Shift, 2014 DOWNLOAD

post

page

attachment

revision

nav_menu_item

custom_css

customize_changeset

oembed_cache

user_request

wp_block

wp_template

wp_template_part

wp_global_styles

wp_navigation

wp_font_family

wp_font_face

acf-taxonomy

acf-post-type

acf-field-group

acf-field

ai1ec_event

exactmetrics_note

ITUC Global Rights Index 2016: The World’s Worst Countries for Workers
Publications

The 2016 ITUC Global Rights Index shows workers’ rights were weakened in almost all regions of the world, including through severe crackdowns on the right to free speech and assembly. Part I of this publication provides a more detailed analysi...Read More

TAGS: Global
“Not a Single Safe Place”: The Ukrainian Refugees at Risk of Violence, Trafficking and Exploitation Findings from Poland and Ukraine
News & AnalysisPublications

Russia’s war on Ukraine has rendered an unprecedented scale of forced displacement, primarily of women and children. Since 24th February 2022, it is estimated that seven million have fled Ukraine to neighbouring countries. As of 1 st November 2022...Read More

TAGS: Europe
Responsible Mining Index
Publications

The Responsible Mining Index (RMI) supports the principle that minerals and metals mining should benefit the economies, improve the lives of people and respect the environments of producing countries, while also benefiting mining companies in a fai...Read More

Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
Publications

The agenda is a plan of action for people, planet and prosperity. It seeks to strengthen uni- versal peace in larger freedom. The agenda recognizes that eradicating poverty in all its forms and dimensions, including extreme poverty, is the greatest g...Read More