About the code

The Code of Good Practice for Setting Social and Environmental Standards (Standard-Setting Code) is ISEAL’s first Code and is widely recognised by international organisations, governments, businesses, and NGOs. It defines effective standard-setting processes, including how a standard is developed, structured and governed. The criteria of the Code and the practices it promotes are underpinned by the ISEAL Credibility Principles, and we believe that by implementing the Standard-Setting Code and embracing the Credibility Principles, organisations are more likely to deliver positive social and environmental impacts.

All standard-setting organisations that are members of the ISEAL Alliance are committed to implementing with the Standard-Setting Code. Associate members must comply with the baseline criteria, while full members must pass through an independent evaluation to show compliance with the improvement criteria in the Standard-Setting Code. A list of the Code criteria (baseline and improvement) can be found here.

ISEAL Codes of Good Practice build credibility

The goal of all ISEAL Codes of Good Practice is to support standards systems to deliver positive social and environmental impact. ISEAL Codes of Good Practice complement each other to achieve this:

  • The ISEAL Code of Good Practice for Setting Social and Environmental Standards (Standard-Setting Code) supports the development of standards that are relevant and transparent and that reflect a balance of stakeholder interests;
  • The ISEAL Code of Good Practice for Assuring Compliance with Social and Environmental Standards (Assurance Code) helps to ensure accurate results from assessments of compliance and to encourage the use of assurance to support learning; and
  • The ISEAL Code of Good Practice for Assessing the Impacts of Social and Environmental Standards Systems (Impacts Code) supports standards systems to measure and improve the results of their work and to ensure that standards are delivering their desired impact.
    Individually, each Code is useful in strengthening a component of a standards system. However, users of standards and other stakeholders will have a higher level of confidence in the effectiveness of a standards system when the Codes are implemented together.
ISEAL Code of Good Practice, 2014 DOWNLOAD

post

page

attachment

revision

nav_menu_item

custom_css

customize_changeset

oembed_cache

user_request

wp_block

wp_template

wp_template_part

wp_global_styles

wp_navigation

wp_font_family

wp_font_face

acf-taxonomy

acf-post-type

acf-field-group

acf-field

ai1ec_event

exactmetrics_note

Guidance Tool for Construction Companies in the Middle East
GuidanceStandards & Codes of ConductGood Practices

In the face of shifting labour market trends within both the Middle East region and the construction sector, the ILO and IOE have identified the need for specialized resources that allow enterprises to develop internal policies and procedures that s...Read More

Florverde Sustainable Flowers Standard
Standards & Codes of Conduct

Florverde® Sustainable Flowers is an independent social and environmental standard for the flower sector that is backed by a strong team of agronomists, social workers and other professionals. This team is responsible for reviewing and updating...Read More

A Policy Framework for Tackling the Economic and Social Impact of the COVID-19 crisis
COVID-19 resourcesStandards & Codes of Conduct

In June 2019, the International Labour Organization’s (ILO’s) 187 member States adopted the ILO Centenary Declaration for the Future of Work, calling on the Organization to pursue “with unrelenting vigour its constitutional mandate for social ...Read More

TAGS: Global
Case Studies of Human Rights Abuses and Environmental Harm linked to EU Companies and how EU due diligence laws could help protect people and the planet
GuidanceStandards & Codes of ConductGood Practices

Over the past few decades, some of the EU’s largest and most well-known companies have been involved in appalling human rights abuses and environmental harm in countries across the globe. The companies have failed to address abuses perpetuated by ...Read More