by Susan Ariel Aaronson and Ethan Wham

Executive Summary

Supply chain initiatives wed government mandates delineating the “right to know” with corporate governance and voluntary corporate social responsibility (CSR) strategies. They are an attempt by government officials (at the behest of their citizens) to mandate companies to be transparent about their supply chain practices in the hopes that firms will then act in a responsible manner. In the US and the EU, policymakers have put in place four supply chain transparency initiatives: two to ensure that a supply chain does not contain conflict minerals and two to ensure that companies divulge slave labour in their supply chain. The conflict minerals supply chain initiatives only tangentially address labour rights, but the two supply chain anti-slavery initiatives directly tackle forced labour issues.

However, the architects of the two supply chain anti-slavery initiatives were influenced by corporate response to Dodd-Frank conflict minerals. These initiatives are relatively new and hence it may be too early to assess their impact. However, the authors reviewed the findings of civil society groups, consulting firms, and researchers in order to provide an initial assessment. In general, these investigators found that these supply chain initiatives:

  • are expensive for firms to implement;
  • have not led the bulk of firms to report, and the ones that do make broad statements and general commitments;
  • require transparency about supply chain practices but say little about how firms should behave when they find slave or trafficked labour;
  • do not yet appear to have changed corporate behavior, although they have led firms to discuss how to address supply chain problems;
  • can help governments and activists monitor those firms that do report but firms are not providing the right kind or sufficient information to facilitate effective monitoring; and
  • can do little to empower workers.

post

page

attachment

revision

nav_menu_item

custom_css

customize_changeset

oembed_cache

user_request

wp_block

wp_template

wp_template_part

wp_global_styles

wp_navigation

wp_font_family

wp_font_face

acf-taxonomy

acf-post-type

acf-field-group

acf-field

ai1ec_event

exactmetrics_note

LEARNING FROM OUR ACTIONS: HOW CAN WE BE COMFORTABLE WITH FAILURE?
Publications

Findings from a series of learning papers previously developed by USAID Asia CTIP in 20211, showed that openly communicating, sharing and learning among CSOs and donors is key to ensuring that iterative programming takes place. This is vital to ensu...Read More

TAGS:
Still in Harm’s Way
Publications

Following the ground-breaking 2016 report Heading Back to Harm, leading charities ECPAT UK and Missing People have revisited the issue using 2017 data to assess what has changed. Still in Harm's Way: An update report on trafficked and unaccompanied ...Read More

TAGS: Europe
What works to prevent violence against children online?
Publications

The report, What works to prevent online violence against children, presents ways to address the growing worldwide concern of keeping children safe online, with a specific focus on two forms of online violence: child sexual abuse including groo...Read More

TAGS:
Training manual to fight trafficking in children for labour, sexual and other forms of exploitation
Publications

This training manual – developed by ILO and UNICEF under the UN Global Initiative to Fight Human Trafficking – seeks to aid governments, workers, employers, international, and non-governmental organizations that combat trafficking in children f...Read More

TAGS: Global