Author: Marika McAdam

Sheltering victims of trafficking require a complex balance to be achieved between the rights of victims (including to freedom of movement and liberty), and the sometimes competing interests of other stakeholders. This Study offers insights into the restrictions that are placed on the freedom of movement of victims of trafficking in the ASEAN Region that may result as States responsible for protecting victims and prosecuting traffickers weigh their own interests more heavily than the rights of victims. The Study does not offer a country-by-country analysis; rather, it considers the arguments generally raised in favour of imposing restrictions on victims’ freedom of movement, in light of relevant laws, policies and practices. Limitations in both the scope and depth of the research undertaken mean that the Study does not represent a comprehensive assessment, and instead provides insight into the current situation with the aim of improving understanding of why certain measures are applied and what actions could be taken to address negative outcomes.

There can be no doubt that the issue of freedom of movement for trafficked persons — most particularly foreign victims — is a complex issue for some States. All countries are under pressure to increase prosecutions of traffickers and it is well established that prosecutions rely heavily on the cooperation of victim-witnesses. Permitting freedom of movement to such persons is seen as risking their participation in the prosecution of their exploiters, thereby costing the State an opportunity to bring traffickers to justice. In respect of foreign victims, permitting freedom of movement of those who have been identified as trafficked may be seen as undermining State capacity to effectively manage migration. States restrict trafficked persons’ liberty in pursuit of different purposes and in the service of different interests.

Whether those purposes are valid or not, and how those interests are to be balanced when they come into conflict with those of victims, are questions at the heart of this Study.

Freedom of movement for persons identified as victims of human trafficking: An analysis of law, policy and practice in the ASEAN Region, 2021 DOWNLOAD

post

page

attachment

revision

nav_menu_item

custom_css

customize_changeset

oembed_cache

user_request

wp_block

wp_template

wp_template_part

wp_global_styles

wp_navigation

wp_font_family

wp_font_face

acf-taxonomy

acf-post-type

acf-field-group

acf-field

ai1ec_event

exactmetrics_note

National Hotline 2016 Nevada State Report
Publications

The following information is based on incoming communication with the National Human Trafficking Hotline from January 1, 2016 – December 31, 2016 about human trafficking cases and issues related to human trafficking in Nevada.  ...Read More

Towards a global indicatoron on unidentified victims in child sexual exploitation material – Technical Report
Publications

Ground-breaking research released by INTERPOL and ECPAT International into the online sexual exploitation of children suggests that when online images or videos of child sexual abuse depict boys or very young children, the abuse is more likely to ...Read More

Knowledge of and access to frontline workers among poor, rural households in Amhara region, Ethiopia: a mixed-methods study
Publications

Social protection programmes have effectively reduced poverty and improved food security. However, the effects of poverty require an intersectoral approach to adequately address poor nutrition and health. Identifying gaps in knowledge and access to ...Read More

TAGS:
Identifying Pathways to Support British Victims of Modern Slavery towards Safety and Recovery: A Scoping Study
News & AnalysisGuidance

Since 2013, the number of British nationals referred into the National Referral Mechanism (NRM) as potential victims of modern slavery has increased year on year, rising from 90 in 2013 to 3,952 in 2021. These figures include potential adult and chi...Read More

TAGS: Europe