Access to legal advice is crucial for survivors of trafficking and modern slavery but the legal aid funding system is failing them. Survivors are not able to access timely and quality, legally aided advice and representation when they need it, with devastating consequences. It is causing destitution, homelessness, anxiety, mental health problems, and missed case deadlines. It is leaving people unable to apply for asylum, in detention and at risk of removal, and is driving some survivors back into exploitation or trafficking. Significant capacity within the anti-trafficking support sector is spent on searching for legal representation, detracting from their ability to support the core needs of survivors.

ATLEU’s survey to frontline support and advocacy organisations shows this stark and alarming gulf in the availability of legally aided advice for survivors.

An enormous 90% of respondents had struggled to find a legal aid immigration lawyer in the past year.

Our survey shows the damaging impact this has on short and long term outcomes for survivors:

• 55% of respondents said it left survivors in destitution or unable to access appropriate accommodation or support

• 97% said it caused survivors stress, anxiety or contributed to poor mental health

• 64% said it resulted in the survivor being unable to meet a deadline in their case, for example with the Home Office

• 57% said it left survivors in a position where they were unable to claim asylum, and others shared experiences of survivors being detained or at risk of removal

• 29% of respondents said it had left survivors in a situation of exploitation.

The primary cause of this legal advice crisis is the legal aid funding system. There are a number of interrelated issues with the legal aid scheme which mean that taking on cases involving victims of trafficking and modern slavery is not viable or sustainable for many legal aid providers. This is because they are uniquely complex, long-running and costly, and therefore are ill-suited to payment by standard legal aid fixed fees which do not change to reflect the time taken or level or work carried out. This also deters the development of specialist expertise, and encourages restricting the level of work carried out on a case, which can lead to poor quality advice and representation.

‘It Has Destroyed Me’- A Legal Advice System on the Brink - Anti Trafficking and Labour Exploitation Unit (ATLEU), 2022 DOWNLOAD

post

page

attachment

revision

nav_menu_item

custom_css

customize_changeset

oembed_cache

user_request

wp_block

wp_template

wp_template_part

wp_global_styles

wp_navigation

wp_font_family

wp_font_face

acf-taxonomy

acf-post-type

acf-field-group

acf-field

ai1ec_event

exactmetrics_note

Legislating human rights due diligence: opportunities and potential pitfalls to the French duty of vigilance law
Publications

By Anna Triponel and John Sherman Introduction On the evening of 23 March 2017, just as the deadline for a decision was approaching, the French Constitutional Court declaredthat the French law on the duty of vigilance (or duty of care) owed by pare...Read More

National Hotline 2018 Oregon State Report
Graphics & InfographicsPublications

The data in this report represents signals and cases from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 and is accurate as of July 25, 2019. Cases of trafficking may be ongoing or new information may revealed to the National Hotline over time. Consequen...Read More

Addressing the Human Cost of Assam Tea: An agenda for change to respect, protect and fulfill human rights on Assam tea plantations
GuidancePublications

Workers on tea plantations in the Assam region of India are systematically denied their rights to a living wage and decent working and living conditions. The fact that they are unable to meet their basic living costs is starkly illustrated by our fi...Read More

ITUC Global Rights Index 2018: The World’s Worst Countries for Workers
Publications

The 2018 ITUC Global Rights Index depicts the world’s worst countries for workers by rating 142 countries on a scale from 1-5 based on the degree of respect for workers’ rights with 1 being the best rating and 5 the worst rating. Violations are r...Read More

TAGS: Global