This special issue of Anti-Trafficking Review bridges the fields of queer and transgender studies, migration studies, research on sex work, and critiques of the discourse on human trafficking. Along with centring LGBTQI+ subjects as actors within the empirical contexts of domestic and cross-border migration and transactional sex, this collection offers a unique set of perspectives on the operations and production of heteronormativity and juridical power within the spaces of informal economies. Broadly, these papers address the implications of the heightened juridical recognition of sexual orientation and gender identity for debates on migration, sex work, and human trafficking. In so doing, they demonstrate how queer theory can build on and complicate extant critiques of the trafficking framework regarding, e.g., the conflation of trafficking and prostitution, and the reduction of people who sell sexual services to tropes of cisnormative female victimhood and helplessness.

Theoretically, the papers in the issue address a key problematic of binary gender that emerges with the consolidation of the contemporary anti-trafficking framework in the late 1990s, discussed in more detail in the sections that follow. This problematic is built around the ways in which the trafficking framework renders sexuality and gender identity in relation to cross-border migration almost exclusively in terms of violence. Because violence subsumes questions of survival within this dominant frame for sex work and, increasingly, migration, any gender identity or sexual orientation other than cis-male heterosexuality is rendered as vulnerability that cannot act, speak, or transact. The issue addresses this gap by repositioning questions of violence, e.g., in marking the violence of state actors,
and by revealing how the discursive elisions constituted by this use of violence are manifested in the everyday lives of people surviving impoverishment around the world. This critique has significant implications for how queer, transgender, and all non-cisnormative people, and non-heteronormative practices, ‘appear’ as juridical categories in migration, asylum, and refugee processes, along with the implications this has for understanding transactional sex itself. Rather than eschewing the existence of unfree labour and human trafficking, the issue shows that mistaking economic migration for trafficking erases significant swathes of lived experience of the vast and growing numbers of people who live in extreme forms of privation and precarity.

Special Issue – Migration, Sexuality, and Gender Identity - Anti-Trafficking Review, 2022 DOWNLOAD














Looking for a Quick Fix – How Weak Social Auditing is Keeping Workers in Sweatshops

This report from 2005 researches the weaknesses of social auditing. Social audits to check working conditions in production facilities emerged in the mid-1990s after a number of high profile companies were widely scrutinized for substandard working ...Read More

Emerging Patterns in the use of Technology for Labour Trafficking in Southeast Asia

This report was originally conceived to be an exploratory analysis of case data on trafficking and exploitation in Southeast Asia that begins online, trying to understand if recruitment is occurring via social media, messaging apps and websites and,...Read More

National Hotline 2016: Puerto Rico Report

The following information is based on incoming communication with the National Human Trafficking Hotline from January 1, 2016 – December 31, 2016 about human trafficking cases and issues related to human trafficking in Puerto Rico.  ...Read More

German Supermarket Supply Chains: Ending the human suffering behind our food

Inequality is rampant across the global economy, and the agro-food sector is no exception. At the top, big supermarkets and other corporate food giants dominate global food markets, allowing them to squeeze value from vast supply chains that span the...Read More